Measure ID: MIPS 145|Imaging|2026 Performance Year

Radiology: Exposure Dose Indices Reported for Procedures Using Fluoroscopy

Final reports for procedures using fluoroscopy that document radiation exposure indices.

Process – High PriorityImagingPatient SafetyRadiology

Last updated: January 15, 2026

⚙️

Measure Specification

Denominator (Eligible Population)

Patient procedure during the performance period
ORPerformance Not Met: Radiation exposure indices not documented in final report for procedure using fluoroscopy, reason not given (G9501)

Denominator Exclusions

None

Numerator

Final reports for procedures using fluoroscopy that include radiation exposure indices.

Submission Codes (QDCs)

✓ Performance Met
G9500Radiation exposure indices documented in final report for procedure using fluoroscopy
✗ Performance Not Met
G9501Radiation exposure indices not documented in final report for procedure using fluoroscopy, reason not given

Denominator Exceptions

None — this measure has no denominator exceptions.

🧮MIPS Score Simulator

Estimate only — actual CMS scoring may vary based on reporting method, data completeness, and annual rule updates.

%Benchmarks vary by collection type
💡 Tip: Enter your performance rate to compare MIPS points across all collection types. The same rate can score differently depending on how you submit.
VBCA Insights

💡Why This Measure Matters

When your team performs fluoroscopy procedures, this measure checks whether you're documenting the radiation dose your patient received. Tracking dose exposure helps reduce unnecessary radiation harm—studies show that practices monitoring fluoroscopy doses significantly lower patient exposure over time. Make it a routine part of your fluoroscopy workflow to record dose metrics like reference air kerma in the final report. Keeping dose top-of-mind also supports conversations with patients about radiation safety.

📖Clinical Rationale

Increasing physician awareness of patient exposure to radiation is an important step towards reducing the potentially harmful effects of radiation as a result of imaging studies. Studies have shown that dose monitoring for fluoroscopy procedures has resulted in an overall reduction in patient radiation exposure. Proper identification and management of patients receiving high doses of radiation from fluoroscopy procedures are essential elements of patient care due to the slowly developing nature of radiation-induced tissue reactions.

📝Clinical Recommendations

All available radiation dose data should be recorded in the patient’s medical record. Adequate recording of dose metrics is defined as documentation in the patient record of at least one of the following for all interventional procedures requiring fluoroscopy (in descending order of desirability): Ka,r, PKA, and PSD. Reference air kerma is the most useful and widely available of these metrics as it is required to be displayed on all fluoroscopes sold in the United States as of June 2006, however all three metrics are sufficient in estimating radiation exposure from fluoroscopic procedures.

(AAPM, 2022) More complete patient radiation dose data should be recorded for all high-dose interventional procedures, such as embolizations, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, and arterial angioplasty or stent placement anywhere in the abdomen and pelvis. (Amis et al., ACR, 2007) PKA, also known as kerma-area product (KAP) or dose-area product (DAP), is the integral of air kerma (the energy extracted from an x-ray beam per unit mass of air in a small irradiated air volume; for diagnostic x-rays, the dose delivered to that volume of air) across the entire x-ray beam emitted from the x-ray tube.

It is a surrogate measure of the amount of energy delivered to the patient, and thus a reasonable indicator of the risk of stochastic effects. The symbol PKA is the notation recommended by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU, 2012).

📋Implementation Notes

This measure contains one strata defined by a single submission criteria. This measure produces a single performance rate. For the purposes of MIPS implementation, this procedure measure is submitted each time a procedure is performed during the performance period.

Report this measure through VBCA

Our QCDR handles measure selection, data validation, and submission—so you can focus on clinical performance.

Learn About Our QCDR →
©2025 American College of Radiology. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government