Measure ID: MIPS 130|Medication Management|2026 Performance Year

2026 MIPS Measure #130: Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

Percentage of visits for which the eligible clinician attests to documenting a list of current medications using all immediate resources available on the date of the encounter.

Process – High PriorityMedication ManagementPatient Safety
Measure ID:MIPS 130 (Quality ID 130)
eCQM:CMS68v15
Collection:MIPS CQM, eCQM
Topped Out:Yes
View CMS Spec ↗

Measure Specification

Eligible Population
Any patient, regardless of age
ANDPatient encounter during the performance period
Exclusions

None

Numerator
Eligible clinician attests to documenting, updating, or reviewing the patient’s current medications using all immediate resources available on the date of the encounter.
Reporting Codes

Performance Met:

G8427Eligible clinician attests to documenting in the medical record they obtained, updated, or reviewed the patient’s current medications

Performance Not Met:

G8428Current list of medications not documented as obtained, updated, or reviewed by the eligible clinician, reason not given

○ Exceptions:

G8430Documentation of a medical reason(s) for not documenting, updating, or reviewing the patient’s current medications list (e.g., patient is in an acute health crisis where time is of the essence and delay of treatment would jeopardize the patient's health status)
VBCA Insights

Why This Measure Matters

This measure ensures that at every visit, providers document a current medication list by reviewing all available resources—prescriptions, patient reports, pharmacy records, and over-the-counter drugs. Medication errors and gaps are common when lists aren't actively maintained; accurate medication reconciliation prevents adverse effects and drug interactions. Develop a systematic process using electronic records and patient input. Update the list at each visit.

VBCA is a CMS-approved Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) that submits MIPS Measure 130 to the Quality Payment Program (QPP). Practices can report this measure as a MIPS Clinical Quality Measure (CQM), as an eCQM, or through qualified registry submission.

🧮MIPS Score Simulator

Estimate only — actual CMS scoring may vary based on reporting method, data completeness, and annual rule updates.

%Benchmarks vary by collection type
💡 Tip: Enter your performance rate to compare MIPS points across all collection types. The same rate can score differently depending on how you submit.

Related Measures

Patient Safety
MIPS 145: Radiology: Exposure Dose Indices Reported for Procedures Using FluoroscopyMIPS 155: Falls: Plan of CareMIPS 164: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Prolonged IntubationMIPS 168: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Surgical Re-ExplorationMIPS 181: Elder Maltreatment Screen and Follow-Up PlanMIPS 259: Rate of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) of Small or Moderate Non-RupturedMIPS 275: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): Assessment of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Status BeforeMIPS 286: Dementia: Safety Concern Screening and Follow-Up for Patients with DementiaMIPS 351: Total Knee or Hip Replacement: Venous Thromboembolic and Cardiovascular RiskMIPS 354: Anastomotic Leak InterventionMIPS 355: Unplanned Reoperation within the 30-Day Postoperative PeriodMIPS 357: Surgical Site Infection (SSI)MIPS 374: Closing the Referral Loop: Receipt of Specialist ReportMIPS 384: Adult Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery: No Return to the OperatingMIPS 385: Adult Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery: Visual Acuity ImprovementMIPS 392: Cardiac Tamponade and/or Pericardiocentesis Following Atrial FibrillationMIPS 393: Infection within 180 Days of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Implantation,MIPS 413: Door to Puncture Time for Endovascular Stroke TreatmentMIPS 422: Performing Cystoscopy at the Time of Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ ProlapseMIPS 432: Proportion of Patients Sustaining a Bladder or Bowel Injury at the time of any PelvicMIPS 513: Patient Reported Falls and Plan of Care

Clinical Rationale

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, during the years of 2013-2016, 48.4% of patients (both male and female) were prescribed at least one prescription medication with 12.6% taking 5 or more medications. Additionally, 89.8% of patients (both male and female) aged 65 years and older were prescribed at least one medication with 40.9% taking 5 or more medications [1].

In this context, maintaining an accurate and complete medication list has proven to be a challenging documentation endeavor for various health care provider settings. While most of outpatient encounters (two-thirds) result in providers prescribing at least one medication, hospitals have been the focus of medication safety efforts [2]. Nassaralla, Naessens, Chaudhry, Hansen, and Scheitel caution that this is at odds with the current trend, where patients with chronic illnesses are increasingly being treated in the outpatient setting and require careful monitoring of multiple medications.

Additionally, Nassaralla et al. reveal that it is in fact in outpatient settings where more fatal adverse drug events (ADE) occur when these are compared to those occurring in hospitals (1 of 131 outpatient deaths compared to 1 in 854 inpatient deaths) [3]. In the outpatient setting, ADEs occur 25% of the time and over one-third of these are considered preventable [4].

Particularly vulnerable are patients over 65 years, with evidence suggesting that the rate of ADEs per 10,000 person per year increases with age; 25-44 years old at 1.3; 45-64 at 2.2, and 65 + at 3.8 [5]. Other vulnerable groups include individuals who are chronically ill or disabled [6]. These population groups are more likely to experience ADEs and subsequent hospitalization.

A multiplicity of providers and inadequate care coordination among them has been identified as barriers to collecting complete and reliable medication records. A study conducted by Poornima et al. indicates that reconciliation and documentation continue to be poorly executed with discrepancies occurring in 92% of patients (74 of 80) admitted to the emergency room.

Of 80 patients included in the study, the home medications were re-ordered for 65% of patients on their admission. Of the 65%, 29% had a change in their dosing interval, while 23% had a change in their route of administration, and 13% had a change in dose. A total of 361 medication discrepancies, or the difference between the medications patients were taking before admission and those listed in their admission orders, were identified in at least 74 patients.

The study found that “Through an appropriate reconciliation programme, around 80% of errors relating to medication and the potential harm caused by these errors could be reduced” [7]. Presley et al. also recognized specific barriers to sufficient medication documentation and reconciliation in rural and resource-limited care settings [8]. Documentation of current medications in the medical record facilitates the process of medication review and reconciliation by the provider, which is necessary for reducing ADEs and promoting medication safety.

The need for provider to provider coordination regarding medication records, and the existing gap in implementation, is highlighted in the American Medical Association’s Physician’s Role in Medication Reconciliation, which states that "critical patient information, including medical and medication histories, current medications the patient is receiving and taking, and sources of medications, is essential to the delivery of safe medical care.

However, interruptions in the continuity of care and information gaps in patient health records are common and significantly affect patient outcomes" [9]. This is because clinical decisions based on information that is incomplete and/or inaccurate are likely to lead to medication error and ADEs. Weeks, Corbette, & Stream noted similar barriers and identified the utilization of health information technology as an opportunity for facilitating the creation of universal medication lists [10].

One 2015 meta-analysis showed an association between electronic health record (EHR) documentation with an overall risk ratio (RR) of 0.46 (95% CI = 0.38 to 0.55; P < 0.001) and ADEs with an overall RR of 0.66 (95% CI = 0.44 to 0.99; P = 0.045). This meta-analysis provides evidence that the use of the EHR can improve the quality of healthcare delivered to patients by reducing medication errors and ADEs [11].

Clinical Recommendations

The Joint Commission's 2023 Ambulatory Health Care National Patient Safety Goals guide clinicians to maintain and communicate accurate patient medication information (2023). Specifically, the section NPSG.03.06.01 "Maintain and communicate accurate patient medication information" states the following: "Obtain and/or update information on the medications the patient is currently taking.

This information is documented in a list or other format that is useful to those who manage medication. Compare the medication information the patient brought to the organization with the medications ordered for the patient by the organization in order to identify and resolve discrepancies.” [12] The Joint Commission's 2023 Hospital National Patient Safety Goals also addressed documenting current medications (2023).

Specifically, the section NPSG.03.06.01 "Maintain and communicate accurate patient information" states the following: "Obtain information on the medications the patient is currently taking when they are admitted to the hospital or is seen in an outpatient setting. This information is documented in a list or other format that is useful to those who manage medications.

" [13] The National Quality Forum's Safe Practices for Better Healthcare - 2010 Update, states the following: “The healthcare organization must develop, reconcile, and communicate an accurate patient medication list throughout the continuum of care”.

Implementation Notes

This measure contains one strata defined by a single submission criteria. This measure produces a single performance rate. For the purposes of MIPS implementation, this visit measure is submitted each time a patient has a denominator eligible encounter during the performance period. MIPS eligible clinicians meet the intent of this measure by making their best effort to document a current, complete and accurate medication list during each encounter.

There is no diagnosis associated with this measure. By submitting the action described in this measure, the provider attests to having documented a list of current medications utilizing all immediate resources available on the day of the encounter. G8427 should be submitted if the MIPS eligible clinician documented that the patient is not currently taking any medications.

Report this measure through VBCA

Our QCDR handles measure selection, data validation, and submission—so you can focus on clinical performance.

Learn About Our QCDR →Talk to Us

©