APP Plus Reporting & MSSP Contract Analytics for ACOs

The software we built to run our own ACO, licensed to yours.

APP Plus reporting through our own CMS-approved registry, and benchmark and savings analytics down to every participant. Three decisions set your ACO's result each year, and this is how you make them on numbers.

0.03%

Our benchmark projection's distance from CMS's final number

What's in the stack

Three modules, one set of numbers underneath

Run the whole stack with us, or license the parts your team doesn't already have. Every module works from the same claims and the same benchmark.
  • 01

    APP Plus quality reporting

    The eight-measure APP Plus set run through Medicare CQMs, MIPS CQMs, and eCQMs, filed on the pathway that scores best through our own CMS-approved QCDR.

    • Your composite against every pathway to the quality standard
    • Collection type priced against your TIN mix and EMR before you elect
    • Gaps worked from the practice down to the patient
  • 02

    Contract and benchmark analytics

    Benchmark, spend, and savings for the ACO and every participant, refreshed as claims come in. Included for ACOs that report APP Plus with VBCA.

    • Participant, coding, and election what-ifs before you act
    • A benchmark projection within 0.03% of CMS's final number
    • An interactive model and a matching Excel workbook
  • 03

    Gap management, down to the patient

    The practices, clinicians, and patients behind every open gap, with outcomes recorded in place and carried back into the composite.

    • Participant TINs and NPIs ranked by opportunity
    • Patient and measure worklists with bulk updates and CSV
    • Custom reports built on request, from inside the app

Three decisions shape an ACO's results each year. The stack is built to get them right.

The three decisions

Each one can swing the result by millions

Each is a modeling question before it is a preference. Change a decision in the model and every figure recomputes, so leadership sees what the year settles at before acting.
  1. 1

    Your quality reporting collection type

    Different collection types produce different APP Plus scores

    eCQM, MIPS CQM, and Medicare CQM do not score the same way, and APP Plus performance feeds shared savings. We price each type against your TIN mix and EMR footprint before you lock it in.

    Read the analysis
  2. 2

    Your track and benchmark election

    BASIC or ENHANCED, prospective or retrospective

    Your track sets the shared-savings rate and the downside risk. Your assignment method changes who is attributed and how the benchmark is built. We re-price both tracks and both methods against your claims.

    Read the analysis
  3. 3

    Who belongs in the ACO

    Who strengthens your savings, and who dilutes them

    Every TIN and NPI on the participant list changes your attributed population, your benchmark, and your path to the minimum savings rate. We run the network as a what-if: who to keep, who to add, and who makes the MSR harder to clear.

    Read the analysis

Start with quality reporting, because it sets how much of your savings you keep.

Quality decides your sharing rate

Your quality score sets how much of the savings you keep

CMS sets the quality performance standard each year as a percentile of MIPS quality scores. For 2026 it is 73.85 points. At or above it, the ACO keeps the full sharing rate for its track, 50% on BASIC Level E. Below it, savings pay at a rate scaled to the composite.

The same performance earns different points

Every measure can be reported on more than one collection type, each with its own benchmark. Here the same 28.96% rate on Measure 001 earns 4.2 points as a Medicare CQM and 8.1 as a MIPS CQM, which reports on a different population.

Measure 001, diabetes glycemic status, at a 28.96% rate. From the VBCA portal, demo data.

Sample scenario

Same patients, same care. Two measures reported a different way.

All measures on Medicare CQM

31.8%

Quality composite 63.50Below the standard: scaled sharing rate

Measures 001 and 236 moved to MIPS CQM

50%

Quality composite 74.51Over the standard: full sharing rate
Projected shared savings on the same $10M pool+$1.825M

Dashed line: the 2026 quality performance standard, 73.85 points.

Here is how the portal helps raise that score, from the whole ACO down to a single patient.

Inside the portal

Four screens your team will work in every week

Pick a view to see it, and enlarge any screen to read it at full size. Every screen is from the live portal, shown with demo data.

Pick a screen to explore· 4 views

Track your quality score all year and know where to focus

The quality composite against the QPS, projected shared savings, and the sharing rate it earns, with the collection type for every measure one click away.

1 of 4 · From the VBCA portal, demo data.

QPS scorecard

VBCA portal QPS Management scorecard for a demo ACO, showing a 63.50 quality composite below the QPS, projected shared savings, and the effective sharing rate

All of these numbers rest on the benchmark, so we check ours against CMS.

Validated against CMS and an independent actuary

What used to take a round of actuarial support appears the moment you ask

You receive an interactive model and a matching Excel workbook, refreshed monthly and reconciled to CMS each quarter. It re-prices your margin under any roster, election, or coding scenario.

About $30,000

What outside actuaries charge for one run of this analysis. Ours runs on demand.

How close the model lands

Distance between our number and the one it was checked against.

  • Benchmark projectionagainst CMS's final benchmark0.03%off
  • Spending projectionagainst the settled year's spending0.1%off
  • Contract modelagainst an independent actuarial review$0off

Refreshed monthly, reconciled to CMS each quarter.

Why ACOs license it from us

Built by an ACO, for the decisions an ACO actually makes

  • We report our own ACO through it

    VBCA sponsors a Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO, and we report it through the same APP Plus module you would use.

  • We helped build the MSSP data model

    Penn Medicine, funded by Gates Ventures, partnered with Tuva Health on an open-source MSSP data model, and chose us from several dozen applicants as its development partner. For a year Tuva engineered and we checked every output against what a live ACO knows to be true.

  • The registry is ours

    APP Plus is submitted through our own CMS-approved QCDR, with 4 CMS-approved quality measures of our own.

  • We write the measures

    Our founding team has written nearly 20 clinical quality measures, and CMS invited us to introduce our SGLT2 measure for chronic kidney disease nationwide in 2027.

For ACO leaders

What ACO teams ask before they license the stack

Not in an ACO yet? VBCA also operates its own ACO for independent practices. Join our ACO

What does the ACO stack include?

APP Plus quality reporting through our CMS-approved QCDR, gap management from the participant practice down to the patient, and benchmark and savings analytics for network, coding, and election decisions, which are included for ACOs that report APP Plus with VBCA.

What is the quality performance standard?

CMS sets it each year as a percentile of MIPS quality scores; for 2026 our portal carries it at 73.85 points. An ACO at or above it keeps the full sharing rate for its track. Below it, the ACO can stay eligible through the alternative standard, but savings pay at a rate scaled to its composite.

How accurate is the contract model?

Our benchmark projection landed within 0.03% of CMS's final benchmark and within 0.1% of the settled year's spending, with no gap to an independent actuarial review. The model is refreshed monthly and reconciled to CMS each quarter.

How does our data get into the platform?

MSSP data from Medicare flows in automatically, alongside a secure claims upload. For eCQM tracking, we work with clinical files.

What do we receive?

The APP Plus portal, from your composite down to each patient, plus an interactive contract model and a matching Excel workbook, refreshed monthly. If a report you need doesn't exist, you can request a custom build from inside the app.

How is it priced?

Custom to your contract track, attributed lives, and how much of the stack you run with us.

See the whole stack against your own data

Bring your claim and enrollment files. We'll show you your benchmark, your collection-type trade-off, and what the 2027 proposals do to both.

Send us your claim files

Helpful to have: your contract track, attributed lives, and the EMRs your participants use.
Start with your filesRead the 2027 analysis

Or email Support@VBCA.com