MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs) in 2026

MVPs are the future of MIPS. Traditional MIPS ends in 2029.

MIPS Value Pathways cut the reporting load, but for now they still score you against the national pool. CMS has proposed MVP-specific benchmarking; that is not how scoring works today. Watch this closely: MVPs become required in performance year 2029, and they are the template for mandatory value-based care.

The Transition

Traditional MIPS ends with the 2029 performance year. MVP becomes required.

2025
MVPs voluntary

Reporting is optional; early adopters build a scoring history while the stakes are still low

Today
2026
Subgroups + proposed benchmarks

Multispecialty groups reporting MVPs must report by subgroup. CMS has proposed MVP-specific benchmarking; national benchmarks still apply today

2027
ASM begins

Mandatory specialty models start for cardiology and low back pain. Registries must fully support applicable MVPs

2029
MVP required

Traditional MIPS ends. MVP reporting becomes required starting with the 2029 performance year

The Benchmark Reality

CMS wants specialty peer scoring. That is not how MVPs work yet.

The promise of an MVP is that a spine surgeon should be scored against spine surgeons. Today, that is not the case. MVP reporters still face national benchmarks by default, which is why many pathways look less attractive than the brochure suggests. CMS has proposed MVP-specific benchmarking; until that lands, the comparison pool is still everyone else.

Today

MVPs use national benchmarks. Fewer measures, same comparison pool as traditional MIPS.

Where CMS is heading

Proposed MVP-specific benchmarking, then mandatory MVP reporting when traditional MIPS ends in 2029.

What Changes

MVPs cut the reporting and raise the accountability.

4
quality measures, instead of 6 in traditional MIPS
1
improvement activity, instead of 2
27
curated pathways, instead of choosing from 200+ measures

The catch: MVPs include population health measures you can't manage through documentation alone. They're scored on outcomes, which means you need to know where your high-cost patients are before CMS does.

What We Do

Both frameworks, side by side, in dollars.

01

Run both scores at once

We process your data through traditional MIPS and the MVP framework simultaneously. You see both scores, and what each is worth, before you pick a path.

02

Report by subgroup

For multispecialty groups, we report each specialty as its own subgroup. One department’s score stops setting everyone’s payment.

03

Registry-ready, already

Starting with the 2027 performance year, CMS requires registries to fully support the MVPs their clinicians report. Ours already does.

See your MVP score before you commit to it.

We'll run your current QPP data through the MVP framework and show you what changes, in points and in dollars.

Run the comparison