Measure ID: MIPS 360|Appropriate Use|2026 Performance Year

2026 MIPS Measure #360: Optimizing Patient Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: Count of Potential High Dose

Percentage of computed tomography (CT) and cardiac nuclear medicine (myocardial perfusion or infarct avid imaging) reports for all patients, regardless of age, that document a count of known previous CT (any type of CT) and cardiac nuclear medicine (myocardial perfusion or infarct avid imaging) studies that the patient has received in the 12-month period prior to the current study.

Process – High PriorityAppropriate UseImagingRadiology
Measure ID:MIPS 360 (Quality ID 360)
Collection:MIPS CQM
Topped Out:Yes
View CMS Spec ↗

Measure Specification

Eligible Population
All patients regardless of age
ANDPatient procedure during the performance period
Exclusions

None

Numerator
CT and cardiac nuclear medicine (myocardial perfusion or infarct avid imaging) reports that document a count of known previous CT (any type of CT) and cardiac nuclear medicine (myocardial perfusion or infarct avid imaging) studies that the patient has received in the 12-month period prior to the current study.
Reporting Codes

Performance Met:

G9321Count of previous CT (any type of CT) and cardiac nuclear medicine (myocardial perfusion or infarct avid imaging) studies documented in the 12-month period prior to the current study

Performance Not Met:

G9322Count of previous CT and cardiac nuclear medicine (myocardial perfusion or infarct avid imaging) studies not documented in the 12-month period prior to the current study, reason not given
VBCA Insights

Why This Measure Matters

When ordering CT or cardiac nuclear medicine scans, your reports should document how many prior imaging studies the patient has had in the past year. This prevents unnecessary repeat scans and helps clinicians make informed decisions about radiation exposure. The key is ensuring your radiology team (or you as the ordering provider) documents the count of previous high-dose studies. Cumulative radiation exposure matters—tracking it reduces redundant tests and protects patients from unwarranted exposure.

VBCA is a CMS-approved Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) that submits MIPS Measure 360 to the Quality Payment Program (QPP). Practices can report this measure as a MIPS Clinical Quality Measure (CQM) or through qualified registry submission.

🧮MIPS Score Simulator

Estimate only — actual CMS scoring may vary based on reporting method, data completeness, and annual rule updates.

%Benchmarks vary by collection type
💡 Tip: Enter your performance rate to compare MIPS points across all collection types. The same rate can score differently depending on how you submit.

Specialty Measure Sets

Related Measures

Appropriate Use
MIPS 065: Appropriate Treatment for Upper Respiratory Infection (URI)MIPS 066: Appropriate Testing for PharyngitisMIPS 102: Prostate Cancer: Avoidance of Overuse of Bone Scan for Staging Low Risk ProstateMIPS 116: Avoidance of Antibiotic Treatment for Acute Bronchitis/BronchiolitisMIPS 261: Referral for Otologic Evaluation for Patients with Acute or Chronic DizzinessMIPS 277: Sleep Apnea: Severity Assessment at Initial DiagnosisMIPS 331: Adult Sinusitis: Antibiotic Prescribed for Acute Viral Sinusitis (Overuse)MIPS 332: Adult Sinusitis: Appropriate Choice of Antibiotic: Amoxicillin With or Without ClavulanateMIPS 335: Maternity Care: Elective Delivery (Without Medical Indication) at < 39 Weeks (Overuse)MIPS 364: Optimizing Patient Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: Appropriateness: Follow-up CTMIPS 405: Appropriate Follow-up Imaging for Incidental Abdominal LesionsMIPS 406: Appropriate Follow-up Imaging for Incidental Thyroid Nodules in PatientsMIPS 416: Emergency Medicine: Emergency Department Utilization of CT for Minor BluntMIPS 421: Appropriate Assessment of Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters for Removal

Clinical Rationale

Increased CT use has resulted in growing rates of repeat or multiple imaging. Physicians may lack important information that could inform their decisions in ordering imaging exams that use ionizing radiation. Ordering physicians may not have access to patients’ medical imaging or radiation dose history. Due to insufficient information, physicians may unnecessarily order imaging procedures that have already been conducted.

Clinical Recommendations

Radiologists, medical physicists, radiologic technologists, and all supervising physicians have a responsibility to minimize radiation dose to individual patients, to staff, and to society as a whole, while maintaining the necessary diagnostic image quality. (Gunderman, et al., 2008)

Implementation Notes

This measure contains one strata defined by a single submission criteria. This measure produces a single performance rate. For the purposes of MIPS implementation, this procedure measure is submitted each time a procedure is performed during the performance period.

Report this measure through VBCA

Our QCDR handles measure selection, data validation, and submission—so you can focus on clinical performance.

Learn About Our QCDR →Talk to Us

©2024 American Board of Medical Specialties, American College of Radiology. All Rights Reserved. Applicable