Measure ID: MIPS 326|Cardiology|2026 Performance Year

Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: Chronic Anticoagulation Therapy

Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter who were prescribed an FDA- approved oral anticoagulant drug for the prevention of thromboembolism during the measurement period.

ProcessCardiologyStroke Prevention

Last updated: January 15, 2026

⚙️

Measure Specification

Denominator (Eligible Population)

Patients aged ≥ 18 years on date of encounter
ANDDiagnosis for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter on date of encounter
ANDPatient encounter during the performance period

Denominator Exclusions5

G9929Patient with transient or reversible cause of AF (e.g., pneumonia, hyperthyroidism, pregnancy, cardiac surgery)
G9930Patients who are receiving comfort care only
G9931Documentation of CHA2DS2-VASc risk score of 0 or 1 for men; or 0, 1, or 2 for women
G0044Patients with moderate or severe mitral stenosis
G0043Patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valve

Numerator

Patients with AF or atrial flutter for whom an FDA-approved oral anticoagulant was prescribed.

Submission Codes (QDCs)

✓ Performance Met
G8967FDA-approved oral anticoagulant is prescribed
✗ Performance Not Met
G9928FDA-approved anticoagulant not prescribed, reason not given

Denominator Exceptions

G8968Documentation of medical reason(s) for not prescribing an FDA-approved anticoagulant (e.g., present or planned atrial appendage occlusion or ligation or patient being currently enrolled in a clinical trial related to AF/atrial flutter treatment)
G8969Documentation of patient reason(s) for not prescribing an oral anticoagulant that is FDA approved for the prevention of thromboembolism (e.g., patient preference for not receiving anticoagulation)

🧮MIPS Score Simulator

Estimate only — actual CMS scoring may vary based on reporting method, data completeness, and annual rule updates.

%Benchmarks vary by collection type
💡 Tip: Enter your performance rate to compare MIPS points across all collection types. The same rate can score differently depending on how you submit.
VBCA Insights

💡Why This Measure Matters

Atrial fibrillation raises stroke risk dramatically—about 2% per year—but oral anticoagulants like apixaban or rivaroxaban cut that risk in half. This measure tracks whether you're prescribing one of these FDA-approved drugs (or warfarin for appropriate patients). If you're not anticoagulating, you should document a clear reason: active bleeding, patient refusal, or an actual contraindication. Without anticoagulation in AF, you're watching preventable strokes happen.

📖Clinical Rationale

A high risk for stroke or systemic embolism is about 2% per year, and all the DOAC trials (Re-LY [Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy]; ROCKET AF [Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation]; ARISTOTLE; and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 [Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation – Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48]) included patients with this level of risk.

Patients at intermediate risk (1%-2%/y) can also benefit from anticoagulation, and the RE-LY and ARISTOTLE trials included this population. Stroke risk scores applied to cohorts give different stroke rates, and therefore any score should be viewed as only an estimate of true risk; in addition, some scores used stroke, while others used thromboembolic events.

Nonetheless, it is practical to use a validated risk score, such as CHA2DS2-VASc, ATRIA, or GARFIELD-AF. Future research may yield improved risk scores that refine how to incorporate risk modifiers, such as female sex and other parameters such as AF burden. Anticoagulation has also been shown to be superior to antiplatelet therapy to reduce stroke risk.

📝Clinical Recommendations

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation (ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS, 2024) 1. For patients with AF and an estimated annual thromboembolic risk of ≥2% per year (e.g., CHA2DS2- VASc score of ≥2 in men and ≥3 in women), anticoagulation is recommended to prevent stroke and systemic thromboembolism. (Class 1, Level of Evidence: A) 2.

For patients with AF receiving warfarin (excludes patients with mechanical valves), a target INR between 2 and 3 is recommended, as well as optimal management of drug-drug interactions, consistency in vitamin K dietary intake, and routine INR monitoring to improve time in therapeutic range and to minimize risks of preventable thromboembolism or major bleeding.

(Class 1, Level of Evidence: B-R). 3. In patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis or mitral stenosis of moderate or greater severity and history of AF, long-term anticoagulation with warfarin is recommended over DOACs, independent of the CHA2DS2-VASc score to prevent cardiovascular events, including stroke or death. (Class 1, Level of Evidence B-R).

📋Implementation Notes

This measure contains one strata defined by a single submission criteria. This measure produces a single performance rate. For the purposes of MIPS implementation, this patient-process measure is submitted a minimum of once per patient during the performance period. The most advantageous quality data code (QDC) will be used if the measure is submitted more than once.

Report this measure through VBCA

Our QCDR handles measure selection, data validation, and submission—so you can focus on clinical performance.

Learn About Our QCDR →
© 2025 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association. All Rights Reserved.