Measure ID: MIPS 221|Rehabilitation|2026 Performance Year

2026 MIPS Measure #221: Functional Status Change for Patients with Shoulder Impairments

A patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of risk-adjusted change in functional status (FS) for patients 14 years+ with shoulder impairments. The change in FS is assessed using the FOTO Shoulder FS PROM. The measure is adjusted to patient characteristics known to be associated with FS outcomes (risk adjusted) and used as a performance measure at the patient, individual clinician, and clinic levels to assess quality.

Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measure – High PriorityRehabilitationPatient-Reported Outcomes
Measure ID:MIPS 221 (Quality ID 221)
Collection:MIPS CQM
Topped Out:No
View CMS Spec ↗

Measure Specification

Eligible Population
All patients aged ≥14 on date of Initial Evaluation
ANDPatient encounter during the performance period identifying evaluationor M-code)
ANDDischarge/discontinuation of the episode of care documented in the medical record (M-code): M1013
Exclusions
M1127Documentation stating patient has a diagnosis of a degenerative neurological condition such as ALS, MS, or Parkinson’s diagnosed at any time before or during the episode of care
G9735Patient unable to complete the Shoulder FS PROM at Initial Evaluation and/or Discharge due to blindness, illiteracy, severe mental incapacity or language incompatibility and an adequate proxy is not available
Numerator
Patients who were presented with the Shoulder FS PROM at Initial Evaluation (Intake) and at or near Discharge (Status) for the purpose of calculating the patient’s Residual Score.
Reporting Codes

Performance Met:

G8663Residual Score for the shoulder impairment successfully calculated and the score was equal to zero (0) or greater than zero (> 0)

Performance Not Met:

G8664Residual Score for the shoulder impairment successfully calculated and the score was less than zero (< 0)
G8666Residual Score for the shoulder impairment not measured because the patient did not complete the Shoulder FS PROM at Initial Evaluation and/or near discharge, reason not given

○ Exceptions:

M1128Ongoing care not clinically indicated because the patient needed a home program only, referral to another provider or facility, or consultation only, as documented in the medical record
M1129Ongoing care not medically possible because the patient was discharged early due to specific medical events, documented in the medical record, such as the patient became hospitalized or scheduled for surgery
M1130Ongoing care not possible because the patient self-discharged early (e.g., financial or insurance reasons, transportation problems, or reason unknown)
G9734Patient refused to participate
VBCA Insights

Why This Measure Matters

Shoulder rehab should restore real function—reaching, lifting, throwing. This PROM-based measure tracks functional status change using FOTO Shoulder assessments from intake to discharge. Quantified improvement in function motivates patients to complete their plan and gives you objective data to adjust treatment. Systematic outcome measurement also helps you benchmark your shoulder program against peer performance.

VBCA is a CMS-approved Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) that submits MIPS Measure 221 to the Quality Payment Program (QPP). Practices can report this measure as a MIPS Clinical Quality Measure (CQM) or through qualified registry submission.

🧮MIPS Score Simulator

Estimate only — actual CMS scoring may vary based on reporting method, data completeness, and annual rule updates.

%Benchmarks vary by collection type
💡 Tip: Enter your performance rate to compare MIPS points across all collection types. The same rate can score differently depending on how you submit.

Related Measures

Patient-Reported Outcomes
MIPS 191: Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity within 90 Days Following Cataract SurgeryMIPS 217: Functional Status Change for Patients with Knee ImpairmentsMIPS 218: Functional Status Change for Patients with Hip ImpairmentsMIPS 219: Functional Status Change for Patients with Lower Leg, Foot or Ankle ImpairmentsMIPS 220: Functional Status Change for Patients with Low Back ImpairmentsMIPS 222: Functional Status Change for Patients with Elbow, Wrist or Hand ImpairmentsMIPS 303: Cataracts: Improvement in Patient’s Visual Function within 90 Days Following CataractMIPS 420: Varicose Vein Treatment with Saphenous Ablation: Outcome SurveyMIPS 459: Back Pain After Lumbar SurgeryMIPS 461: Leg Pain After Lumbar SurgeryMIPS 470: Functional Status After Primary Total Knee ReplacementMIPS 471: Functional Status After Lumbar SurgeryMIPS 478: Functional Status Change for Patients with Neck ImpairmentsMIPS 483: Person-Centered Primary Care Measure Patient Reported OutcomeMIPS 485: Psoriasis – Improvement in Patient-Reported Itch SeverityMIPS 486: Dermatitis – Improvement in Patient-Reported Itch SeverityMIPS 505: Reduction in Suicidal Ideation or Behavior Symptoms

Clinical Rationale

Functional deficits are common in the general population and are costly to the individual, their family, and society. Improved functional status has been associated with greater quality of life, self-efficacy, improved financial well-being, and lower future medical costs. Improving functional status in people seeking rehabilitation has become a goal of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA).

Therefore, measuring change in functional status is important for providers treating patients in rehabilitation and can be used to assess the success of treatment and direct modification of treatment. Change in functional status represents the Activities and Participation domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

If treatment is designed to improve the functional deficit, it is logical to assess functional status at discharge using a standardized score to determine if it improved over the treatment episode.

Clinical Recommendations

The American Physical Therapy Association, in their Guide to Physical Therapist Practice, described five recommended elements of patient management: examination, evaluation, diagnosis, prognosis, and intervention. The elements were intended to direct therapists in their approach to patient treatment for the purpose of optimizing patient outcomes. The APTA clearly identifies functional status data as one of the major forms of data to be collected for patients receiving rehabilitation.

The functional status measures should be used to assist in the planning, implementation, and modification of treatment interventions and should be used as measures of outcomes. The current functional status scores can be used by therapists to fulfill the recommended methods of the APTA in the management of patients in rehabilitation.

Implementation Notes

This measure contains one stratum defined by a single submission criteria. This measure produces a single performance rate. For purposes of MIPS implementation, this episode measure is submitted once for each treatment episode during the performance period. It requires submitting the patient’s FS PROM score, at a minimum, at the start (Initial Evaluation or Intake) and again at the conclusion (Discharge) of a Treatment Episode.

The Initial Evaluation score is recorded during the first treatment encounter, and the Discharge score is recorded at or near the conclusion of the final treatment encounter. Definitions: Functional Deficit – Limitation or impairment of physical abilities/function resulting in evaluation and inclusion in a treatment plan of care. Treatment Episode – A “Treatment Episode” is defined as beginning with an Initial Evaluation for a functional shoulder deficit, progressing through treatment without interruption (for example, a hospitalization or surgical intervention), and ending with Discharge, signifying that the treatment has been completed.

A patient currently under clinical care for a shoulder functional deficit remains in a single “Treatment Episode” until the Discharge is conducted and documented by the MIPS eligible clinician. Initial Evaluation – An “Initial Evaluation” is the first encounter for a functional deficit involving the shoulder and includes an evaluation (CPT 97161, 97162, 97163, 97165, 97166, 97167, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, 98940, 98941, 98942, 98943*, 99304, 99305, or 99306), or an “Initial Evaluation” Status M- code (M1126).

A patient presenting with a shoulder impairment, who has had an interruption of a Treatment Episode for the same functional shoulder deficit secondary to an appropriate reason like hospitalization or surgical intervention, is an “Initial Evaluation”. Discharge – “Discharge” is accompanied by a treatment finalization and evaluation completion M-Code (M1013) identifying the close of a Treatment Episode for the same shoulder deficit identified at the Initial Evaluation and documented by a discharge report by the MIPS eligible clinician.

An interruption in clinical care for an appropriate reason like hospitalization or surgical intervention requires a “discharge” from the current Treatment Episode. Encounter – A visit between the patient and the provider for the purpose of assessing and/or improving a functional deficit. Patient Reported – The patient directly provides answers to FS PROM items.

If the patient cannot reliably respond independently (e.g. in the presence of cognitive deficits), a suitable proxy may provide answers. Risk Adjustment Factors – A set of factors used to calculate a patient’s risk score which predict the outcome score. In addition to the risk adjustment factors collected in the patient demographic portion of the assessment, a full list of considered specific comorbidity details can be found in Table 1 of this publication https://www.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29787696 7. The Shoulder FS PROM score 1,2,3,4,5,6 – The “Shoulder FS PROM score” may be achieved using one of three forms: the FOTO Shoulder FS PROM computer adaptive test, the FOTO Shoulder FS PROM short form, or an alternative PROM score that is cross-walked to the FOTO Shoulder FS PROM using a cross-walk form developed by the measure steward.

Computer adaptive test (CAT) is recommended to achieve best balance between reduced patient burden and score precision. At least one cross-walk form has been developed by the measure steward and meets scientific standards to successfully link a construct-equivalent PROM using advanced psychometric equating methods. For more information about the Shoulder FS PROM score forms and to access the components that are available free of charge for use with this MIPS quality measure [e.

g., patient-reported outcome measure(s), cross-walking, risk adjustment], visit Public Access to FOTO Measures.

Report this measure through VBCA

Our QCDR handles measure selection, data validation, and submission—so you can focus on clinical performance.

Learn About Our QCDR →Talk to Us

©2024 Net Health Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved