Measure ID: MIPS 047|Advance Care Planning|2026 Performance Year

Advance Care Plan

Percentage of patients aged 65 years and older who have an advance care plan or surrogate decision maker documented in the medical record or documentation in the medical record that an advance care plan was discussed but the patient did not wish or was not able to name a surrogate decision maker or provide an advance care plan.

Process – High PriorityAdvance Care PlanningPatient Communication

Last updated: January 15, 2026

⚙️

Measure Specification

Denominator (Eligible Population)

Patients aged ≥ 65 years on date of encounter
ANDPatient encounter during the performance period
WITHOUTPlace of Service (POS): 23

Denominator Exclusions1

G9692Hospice services received by patient any time during the measurement period

Numerator

Patients who have an advance care plan or surrogate decision maker documented in the medical record or documentation in the medical record that an advance care plan was discussed but patient did not wish or was not able to name a surrogate decision maker or provide an advance care plan.

Submission Codes (QDCs)

✓ Performance Met
1123FAdvance Care Planning discussed and documented; advance care plan or surrogate decision maker documented in the medical record
1124FAdvance Care Planning discussed and documented in the medical record; patient did not wish or was not able to name a surrogate decision maker or provide an advance care plan
✗ Performance Not Met
1123F with 8PAdvance Care Planning not documented, reason not otherwise specified

Denominator Exceptions

None — this measure has no denominator exceptions.

🧮MIPS Score Simulator

Estimate only — actual CMS scoring may vary based on reporting method, data completeness, and annual rule updates.

%Benchmarks vary by collection type
💡 Tip: Enter your performance rate to compare MIPS points across all collection types. The same rate can score differently depending on how you submit.
VBCA Insights

💡Why This Measure Matters

This measure tracks whether seniors have documented conversations about their wishes for end-of-life care, including naming a healthcare proxy or creating an advance directive. Advance care planning ensures your patients' values and preferences guide their care when they cannot speak for themselves, reducing unwanted interventions and hospitalizations. Have this conversation early and document it thoroughly—frame it as planning, not pessimism. Update the plan as circumstances or preferences change.

📖Clinical Rationale

Advance care planning is a continuous process of conversation and documentation to align a patient’s care and interventions with their beliefs, values and preferences, in the event they become unable to make those decisions. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) describe advance care planning as a face-to-face service to discuss a patient’s health wishes that may or may not include completing relevant documentation (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), 2019).

A number of documents may be completed as a result of the advance care planning conversation in order to capture a patient’s wishes and goals for care. These documents are generally referred to as “advance directives” and can include: Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care (DPAHC), living will, and combined directives. In addition to these documents, a patient may have a Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), also referred to as Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOLST).

A patient may also identify a surrogate decision maker to serve as their representative and decision maker in the event they cannot make decisions for themselves. Although it is widely agreed that advance care planning is a critical part of patient care, only about 50% of older adults have engaged in advance care planning. Of those older adults, about one-third have documented their wishes and only 10%–20% discussed their wishes with clinicians;.

A 2017 study found that 70% of providers indicated they only have advance care planning conversations with their patients experiencing advanced illness. The benefits of advance care planning may only be realized if the care team has access to and follows the patient’s advance care plan. Advance care planning can lead to decreased psychological distress and hospitalizations as well as improved end-of-life care, increased trust in providers and improved quality of life, and can facilitate hope.

It has also been associated with increased knowledge about treatment options, documentation of advance care planning, patient-surrogate congruence, goal concordant care and compliance with patient wishes, among others;;;.

📝Clinical Recommendations

Advance directives are designed to respect patient’s autonomy and determine his/her wishes about future life- sustaining medical treatment if unable to indicate wishes. Key interventions and treatment decisions to include in advance directives are: resuscitation procedures, mechanical respiration, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, dialysis, simple diagnostic tests, pain control, blood products, transfusions, and intentional deep sedation.

Oral statements: Conversations with relatives, friends, and clinicians are most common form; should be thoroughly documented in medical record for later reference. Properly verified oral statements carry same ethical and legal weight as those recorded in writing. Instructional advance directives (DNR orders, living wills): Written instructions regarding the initiation, continuation, withholding, or withdrawal of particular forms of life- sustaining medical treatment.

May be revoked or altered at any time by the patient. Clinicians who comply with such directives are provided legal immunity for such actions. Durable power of attorney for health care or health care proxy: A written document that enables a capable person to appoint someone else to make future medical treatment choices for him or her in the event of decisional incapacity.

(AGS) The National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization provides the Caring Connection web site, which provides resources and information on end-of-life care, including a national repository of state-by-state advance directives.

📋Implementation Notes

This measure contains one strata defined by a single submission criteria. This measure produces a single performance rate. For the purposes of MIPS implementation, this patient-process measure is submitted a minimum of once per patient for the performance period. The most advantageous quality data code (QCD) will be used if the measure is submitted more than once.

Report this measure through VBCA

Our QCDR handles measure selection, data validation, and submission—so you can focus on clinical performance.

Learn About Our QCDR →
©2012-2025 National Committee for Quality Assurance. All Rights Reserved.