Measure ID: MIPS 024|Care Coordination|2026 Performance Year

Communication with the Physician or Other Clinician Managing On-Going Care Post-

Percentage of patients aged 50 years and older treated for a fracture with documentation of communication, between the physician treating the fracture and the physician or other clinician managing the patient’s on-going care, that a fracture occurred and that the patient was or should be considered for osteoporosis treatment or testing. This measure is submitted by the physician who treats the fracture and who therefore is held accountable for the communication.

Process – High PriorityCare CoordinationOsteoporosis

Last updated: January 15, 2026

⚙️

Measure Specification

Denominator (Eligible Population)

Patients aged ≥ 50 years on date of encounter or procedure
ANDDiagnosis for a fracture, except fractures of the finger, toe, face or skull
ANDPatient encounter during the performance period
ORPatient procedure during the performance periodCodes)

Denominator Exclusions1

G9688Patients using hospice services any time during the measurement period

Numerator

Patients with documentation of communication with the physician or other clinician managing the patient’s on-going care that a fracture occurred and that the patient was or should be considered for osteoporosis testing or treatment.

Submission Codes (QDCs)

✓ Performance Met
5015FDocumentation of communication that a fracture occurred and that the patient was or should be tested or treated for osteoporosis
✗ Performance Not Met
5015F with 8PNo documentation of communication that a fracture occurred and that the patient was or should be tested or treated for osteoporosis, reason not otherwise specified

Denominator Exceptions

None — this measure has no denominator exceptions.

🧮MIPS Score Simulator

Estimate only — actual CMS scoring may vary based on reporting method, data completeness, and annual rule updates.

%Benchmarks vary by collection type
💡 Tip: Enter your performance rate to compare MIPS points across all collection types. The same rate can score differently depending on how you submit.
VBCA Insights

💡Why This Measure Matters

This measure ensures that when a patient over 50 breaks a bone, the treating physician communicates with the primary care doctor about osteoporosis screening or treatment needs. Fragility fractures are a key warning sign for underlying bone disease; coordinated follow-up improves detection and prevents future breaks. Document the communication clearly in both the acute and primary care records. Ensure the patient gets either a bone density test or is considered for treatment to reduce fracture risk.

📖Clinical Rationale

This measure aims to improve the communication and coordination from the physician treating the fracture in the acute care setting to the physician or clinician who is responsible for follow-up care for osteoporosis. Patients who experience a fragility fracture should either be treated or screened for the presence of osteoporosis. Although the fracture may be treated by the orthopedic surgeon, the testing and/or treatment is likely to be under the responsibility of the physician providing on-going care.

It is important the physician or other clinician providing on- going care for the patient be made aware the patient has sustained a fracture so that the proper care and treatment plan can be put in place to prevent a secondary fracture from occurring. This measure holds the physician who treated the fracture accountable for this communication to the on-going care provider.

📝Clinical Recommendations

The most important risk factors for osteoporosis-related fractures are a prior low-trauma fracture as an adult and a low BMD in patients with or without fractures. (Watts, et al., 2010) BMD measurement should be performed in all women 40 years old or older who have sustained a fracture. (AACE) The decision to measure bone density should follow an individualized approach.

It should be considered when it will help the patient decide whether to institute treatment to prevent osteoporotic fracture. It should also be considered in patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy for 2 months or more and patients with other conditions that place them at high risk for osteoporotic fracture. (NIH) The most commonly used measurement to diagnose osteoporosis and predict fracture risk is based on assessment of BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

(NIH) Measurements of BMD made at the hip predict hip fracture better than measurements made at other sites while BMD measurement at the spine predicts spine fracture better than measures at other sites. (NIH) The single most powerful predictor of a future osteoporotic fracture is the presence of previous such fractures.

📋Implementation Notes

This measure contains one strata defined by a single submission criteria. This measure produces a single performance rate. For the purposes of MIPS implementation, this episode measure is submitted once for each occurrence of a particular illness or condition during the performance period. Patients with a fracture should have documentation in the medical record of communication from the clinician treating the fracture to the clinician managing the patient’s on-going care that the fracture occurred and that the patient was or should be tested or treated for osteoporosis.

If multiple fractures occurring on the same date of service are submitted on the same claim form, only one instance of submission will be counted. Claims data will be analyzed to determine unique occurrences. Documentation must indicate that communication to the MIPS eligible clinician managing the on-going care of the patient occurred within three months of treatment for the fracture.

The CPT Category II code should be submitted during the episode of care (e.g., treatment of the fracture). The submission of the code and documentation of communication do not need to occur simultaneously. Eligible cases are determined, and must be reported, if either of the following conditions (submission criteria) are met.

Report this measure through VBCA

Our QCDR handles measure selection, data validation, and submission—so you can focus on clinical performance.

Learn About Our QCDR →
©2012-2025 National Committee for Quality Assurance. All Rights Reserved.