Ambulatory Specialty Model

The data already exists.

ASM makes value-based accountability mandatory for certain specialists beginning January 2027. CMS will adjust up to 12% of your Part B revenue based on episode cost and quality performance—scored against peers in your specialty and region.

The episode data CMS will use is structurally the same as what's available through MIPS today. The preparation window is now.

What is the Ambulatory Specialty Model (ASM)?

The Ambulatory Specialty Model (ASM) is not a new reporting requirement; it is a fundamental shift to episode-based accountability. CMS is moving away from aggregate MIPS scores to measure specialists on three specific pillars:

Specialty-Specific Peer Groups

You are no longer compared to the general pool, but exclusively to peers within your clinical specialty.

Episode Cost Measurement

Performance is determined by the total cost of care for defined clinical episodes.

Mandatory Revenue Risk

At full maturity, the model shifts from voluntary participation to a mandatory 12% Part B revenue adjustment.

For a deep dive into the regulatory mechanics, read our full analysis:

The Ambulatory Specialty Model Explained

Am I in a mandatory area?

ASM applies to 235 randomly selected metro areas. CMS stratified by spending and episode volume, then selected roughly 25% for mandatory participation.

Or browse by state:

Specialty and volume determine participation.

CMS determines your specialty based on the code used most frequently on your Medicare Part B claims. You must treat at least 20 attributed episodes in the relevant condition to be included.

Heart Failure Cohort

Cardiology

Specialty
Cardiology (primary specialty code)
Volume Requirement
20+ episodes/year
(Two Part B claims within 180 days from same clinician)
Attribution
Must bill ≥30% of episode services
Low Back Pain Cohort

Spine & Pain Specialties

Specialties
Orthopedic surgery, Neurosurgery, Pain management, Anesthesiology, PM&R
Volume Requirement
20+ episodes/year
(ICD-10 diagnosis + confirming code within 60 days)
Attribution
Must bill ≥30% of episode services

Volume is assessed using 2025 data for the 2027 performance year.

Real revenue at risk.

Unlike MIPS, where most practices cluster near the performance threshold, ASM is designed to create meaningful payment differentiation. CMS chose penalties—not bonuses—for improvement activities and interoperability specifically to ensure scores don't cluster.

±9%
Year 1 (2027)
Of Part B revenue
±12%
Year 5 (2031)
Escalates annually
15%
Medicare Retention
Before redistribution
MIPS vs ASM Comparison
MIPSASM
Benchmarked againstAll MIPS cliniciansSpecialty peers only
Performance thresholdFixed targetNo threshold—relative only
Maximum adjustment±9%±12% by 2031

The preparation window.

Today
Prepare using existing MIPS data
Early 2026
Preliminary participant list
Mid-2026
Final notification
Jan 2027
Performance year begins
2029
First payment adjustments

Twelve months of preparation beats twelve months of waiting.

The episode-based cost measures CMS will use for ASM scoring are structurally the same as what's available through MIPS today. Different cadence, same underlying methodology.

Understand your cost position

Your MIPS episode data shows which patients drive costs. The same cohorts will drive ASM performance.

Identify variation

Episode-level visibility reveals where costs diverge from peers—imaging, hospitalizations, post-acute care.

Build primary care relationships

ASM requires collaborative care arrangements. Start those conversations now.

Test your reporting infrastructure

The 75% completeness rule means gaps in data capture become zeros in scoring.

Detailed preparation checklist

Built for programs like this.

VBCA was founded by operators working inside federal value-based care programs. When CMS announced ASM, we didn't need new infrastructure—we pointed existing tools at a new use case.

Included as standard

Episode Cost Analytics

We built cost analytics because we needed it ourselves. The platform surfaces CMS cost data, identifies which patients drive episode costs, and shows where you stand relative to peers.

Episode-level cost visibility. Standard.

Explore cost analytics
CMS-approved measures

Cardiology-Specific Measures

Our AVBC measures address gaps in existing measure sets:

  • Echocardiogram Stewardship: Appropriate use in CHF—targets utilization patterns ASM will penalize
  • Noninvasive Ischemic Imaging: Reduces unnecessary stress imaging in chronic coronary disease
  • SGLT2 Inhibitors in CKD: Evidence-based prescribing that reduces heart failure hospitalizations
View the measures library
One data load

Unified Program Tracking

MIPS, MVPs, and ASM draw from overlapping data. Load once, track everything. If you fall below ASM's episode threshold and revert to MIPS, you'll have visibility into both.

See the platform

See how your current data maps to ASM.

Whether you're in a mandatory area or preparing proactively, we can show you where you stand using data that already exists.

Talk to us about ASM readiness